Re:Supreme court: Warrantless cell phone searches illegal [pdf]
by hamiltonkibbe on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @11:57AM
(#7944747)
I believe this referring to a discussion on an article about the use of Stingray-type devices (If someone can provide the link that would be great), particularly how their use was concealed from courts when obtaining a search warrant. Instead of telling the court that the information was obtained by use of a Stingray, they told the court the information came from a "confidential source"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme court: Warrantless cell phone searches illegal [pdf]
by joshlegs on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @12:08PM
(#7944823)
you're correct. I'll try to find the source later, but this was exactly the case. Police would install the tracker or whatever, then tell the judge it came from a confidential source (the legal definition of which is a person). Meaning that police were outright lying to judges.
edit: source -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7931548