Re:A SWAT team blew a hole in my 2-year-old son
by danielweber on Wednesday June 25, 2014 @09:02AM
(#7943607)
If I am required to maintain documents in a civil case, and I destroy them, generally the other side is allowed to assume they were as bad as possible.
Does this apply in criminal trials? If there's evidence I was flushing drugs down the toilet (and such evidence would be there), can the state be allowed to assume I had a lot more of the drug than I really did? What are the policy implications?
Maybe they bust you with less, but they'll still bust you.