Re:Redacted memo justifying drone strikes on US citizens [pdf]
by VonGuard on Monday June 23, 2014 @12:30PM
(#7932816)
I think the issue is whether or not the government can "disappear" people. In other countries, we've already been doing this for decades, but in theory, at least, it doesn't happen to US citizens. If the US is allowed to just send a drone strike on a US citizen, who is otherwise entitled to due process, the thinking is that the government can just ignore due process and start killing people from afar. Bad precedent.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Redacted memo justifying drone strikes on US citizens [pdf]
by ambiate on Monday June 23, 2014 @12:35PM
(#7932856)
As a democracy and regardless of citizenship, doesn't _everyone_ deserve due process? The first thought that crosses my mind are Canadian terrorist mounties with snow wolves, snow mobiles, alcohol and aboots. Would they be droned by the US or captured and trialed?
Re:Redacted memo justifying drone strikes on US citizens [pdf]
by microcolonel on Monday June 23, 2014 @12:39PM
(#7932880)
No public evidence that this has happened yet, though I wouldn't doubt that it's been done. (terrorist mountie here, funded by illegal maple syrup trafficking if you really must know ;)
Re:Redacted memo justifying drone strikes on US citizens [pdf]
by SatoshiPacioli on Monday June 23, 2014 @12:38PM
(#7932877)
> As a democracy and regardless of citizenship, doesn't _everyone_ deserve due process?
Not if they are an imminent threat.
Re:Redacted memo justifying drone strikes on US citizens [pdf]
by rational-future on Monday June 23, 2014 @12:44PM
(#7932921)
>> Not if they are an imminent threat
to the corrupted establishment.
Re:Redacted memo justifying drone strikes on US citizens [pdf]
by anonbanker on Monday June 23, 2014 @07:18PM
(#7935369)
It's "a-boat." "Aboot" is a south park joke.