Re:Erik Meijer: Duality and the End of Reactive [video]
by haberman on Friday June 13, 2014 @05:06AM
(#7887935)
> Well, he kind of does.
If he has that much background I would expect him to know better than to give such a poor example when he's trying to make fun of a definition as "dilbert-esque."
Tongue-in-cheek is a fun style and I totally get that, but if you're taking unfair hyperbolic pot-shots I think it should be at your own expense, not other people's. But that's just me.
If he has that much background I would expect him to know better than to give such a poor example when he's trying to make fun of a definition as "dilbert-esque."
Tongue-in-cheek is a fun style and I totally get that, but if you're taking unfair hyperbolic pot-shots I think it should be at your own expense, not other people's. But that's just me.