News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by Istof on Monday June 09, 2014 @01:00PM (#7869265)
Using this method, you could possibly reduce load times by sending Javascript and CSS files with the HTML file
Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by kevinbowman on Monday June 09, 2014 @06:14PM (#7870813)
That's a multipart response [0]. In the early days of 3G (and multimedia phones) we used to use those for some models of phone which supported it to give a better browsing experience - the gamble being that more downstream data would be faster than costing a request / response round-trip if you were pretty confident that the phone was going to ask for it.

[0] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1806228/browser-support-o...

Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by jonny_eh on Monday June 09, 2014 @02:59PM (#7869871)
Assuming those requests are sent in order, that could be an interesting optimization!
Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by jacquesm on Monday June 09, 2014 @09:36PM (#7871478)
> Assuming those requests are sent in order

That's the problem right there. Right off the bat I don't see how to get around that one.

Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by jonny_eh on Monday June 09, 2014 @09:39PM (#7871493)
They'd also have to be all on the same connection. Also, you'd lose out on caching.

At that point you might as well just inline the css and javascript.

Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by nl on Monday June 09, 2014 @11:19PM (#7871688)
Dynamically generated unique hostnames per resource would work.
Re:The Several Million Dollar Bug by corford on Tuesday June 10, 2014 @11:32AM (#7873105)
I'm probably missing something but... wouldn't all the extra dns lookups remove most of the speed advantage?