News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Clearing the Air by WalterBright on Monday June 09, 2014 @12:00AM (#7866948)
1. I have a steep driveway, and when it was poured I looked into putting a heating element in it for about 20 feet to keep the ice off. I don't remember the details, but it was a fantastic amount of money to do it, and required special heavy amperage power connections. I abandoned the idea.

2. If using heating elements was cost efficient to keep ice off, you can bet the military and civilian airfields would use it to keep the runways clear. They do not. My father used to work at an Alaska military airbase, he said that snow and ice removal on the runway was a 24/7 operation. They weren't fools, if the heating element idea would work they'd have used it.

Re:Clearing the Air by dmoy on Monday June 09, 2014 @12:13AM (#7866984)
Yea I'm mostly agreeing with you. I just mean numbers wise it might not be strictly impossible to do (except in places where you get >2" of snow, in which case it might actually become strictly impossible). I make no claims towards its feasibility :P

Not that they provided any actual data for us to tell if it is impossible or not.

Edit: hell, they don't even make a cost comparison to putting regular old solar panels next to the road, instead of baked into the road, and using the energy from that to do whatever fancy shit.

Re:Clearing the Air by SoftwareMaven on Monday June 09, 2014 @12:33AM (#7867046)
The question I have is how different the solar roadways, designed with this in mind, would behave from running heating elements through concrete or asphalt? Could they get an order of magnitude difference?
Re:Clearing the Air by dredmorbius on Monday June 09, 2014 @08:08PM (#7871220)
Their proposal is running heating elements through the roadbed. The heaters are even on different circuits from the solar elements.

The only difference is that the top layer is glass rather than concrete / asphalt.