Re:High Frequency Trading and Finance's Race to Irrelevance
by hkmurakami on Thursday June 05, 2014 @05:27PM
(#7854658)
In general though, finance firms (at least the publicly traded ones where we can see their books) reserve a higher proportion of revenue for compensation compared to tech firms. Not entirely sure at HFT shops, but I think that may be what the grandparent comment may be referring to (and I agree that we could do better if our goal were to be more equitable -- but no one has an incentive to do this on a grand scale yet)
Re:High Frequency Trading and Finance's Race to Irrelevance
by kasey_junk on Thursday June 05, 2014 @05:52PM
(#7854813)
That's the thing. There are only a couple of publicaly traded HFT firms and they are tiny. Their compensation looks more like a technology firm than a "finance" firm.
Remember, that the vast majority of people who make large compensation in a finance firm are essentially sales force. They are selling complex products, financial services, or operations.
Now if you are talking about ibank traders who HFT are replacing, that is true. Their salary bands are enormously higher than engineer pay scales. Sort of explains why they direct so much vitriol towards HFT.