News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Learning to Love Complex Numbers by cwhy on Monday May 26, 2014 @10:45PM (#7802605)
I just hate them.. Why don't we just use vectors and make math easier to learn?
Re:Learning to Love Complex Numbers by darkmighty on Monday May 26, 2014 @11:09PM (#7802666)
Complex numbers are the key to complex analysis which is different than just real multivariate calculus (it has certain constraints).
Re:Learning to Love Complex Numbers by onedognight on Monday May 26, 2014 @11:25PM (#7802706)
> Why don't we just use vectors and make math easier to learn?

We do just use vectors; over complex numbers. You really want both, where the vectors themselves are made up of[1] complex numbers. Using a single complex number to represent a vector has gone out of style in some sense because it's restricted to two dimensions. For example historically it was quite common to represent the velocity of a fluid at each point with a complex number. While you can do this, and there are many of advantages, most don't generalize to higher dimensions.

[1] technically the field is complex numbers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_%28mathematics%29

Re:Learning to Love Complex Numbers by sobellian on Monday May 26, 2014 @11:45PM (#7802756)
Complicated math concepts (like differential equations) are much easier to learn with a solid background in complex numbers. Vectors are important, but so are complex numbers.
Re:Learning to Love Complex Numbers by tobinfricke on Tuesday May 27, 2014 @01:26AM (#7803021)
How would you compute exp(v) for a vector v? (for example)
Re:Learning to Love Complex Numbers by cwhy on Monday May 26, 2014 @10:46PM (#7802607)
And basically, negative numbers can be avoided as well using the concept of vectors