News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Euclid, Schmeuclid by RiderOfGiraffes on Saturday August 22, 2009 @05:52PM (#779865)
I don't see the point of this. It's wrong, if you spend a moment's thought then it's obvious why it's wrong, and it's about as enlightening or entertaining as the usual proof that 0=1.

Can anyone explain what they like about this?

There are no comments on this comment yet.