This is somewhat off topic, but I've always thought of Library Genesis as a modern-day Library of Alexandria. Both contain vast stores of priceless knowledge, and both employ(ed) somewhat less than optimal means of obtaining their books.
I wonder if the individuals who wrote that report can see the similarities too. It's going to be a sad day if they manage to raze LibGen as well.
Re:Scribd and Quora considered harmful
by dredmorbius on Sunday May 25, 2014 @08:48PM
(#7798206)
Interesting insight. I've only recently found LibGen, and it's simply amazing for conducting research.
I expect it will be attacked, possibly successfully, but other alternatives will rise to take its place.
More like the Dailymotion or the Vimeo, but I see what you mean.
I wonder if you could add a condition to a document's license, CC or whatever, forbidding it being hosted behind any kind of pay- or signup-wall?
Re:Scribd and Quora considered harmful
by dredmorbius on Sunday May 25, 2014 @08:46PM
(#7798203)
The GNU GPL generally requires works be provided in the "preferred form" for making modifications. That might well be a hack around Scribd's methods.
Today I incidentally read the current (March 2014) "Gutenberg 3.5 - Ebook Piracy Report"[1]. It seems to be from an anti-piracy lobbying group, so its obviously biased, but it mentions Scribd even before Library Genesis.
That being said: Scribd seems to be (or has been?) one of the most successful Y Combinator companies[2] and is sometimes called "YouTube of documents"[3].