Scribd and Quora considered harmful

Re:Scribd and Quora considered harmful by nacs on Sunday May 25, 2014 @02:06PM (#7796992)

There's nothing "noble" about spamming search engines with full text results then putting up a login-wall for the same content you arrived on the page for.

Tricking random users looking for an answer that's supposedly there into registering so they can see the 1 answer is not increasing engagement, just signup counts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scribd and Quora considered harmful by dror on Sunday May 25, 2014 @05:13PM (#7797576)

How is it that Google doesn't penalize them for this? I thought it's considered a big no-no to show people something different than what you show the crawler.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scribd and Quora considered harmful by dangelo on Monday June 02, 2014 @03:10AM (#7832247)

We serve the same content to Google that we serve to users. We have no interest in deceiving them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scribd and Quora considered harmful by dangelo on Monday June 02, 2014 @03:18AM (#7832268)

We don't care about signup counts, only about real engagement. Most people have no problem with registering, and the engagement from logged in users is so much higher that it more than offsets the small minority of people who don't want to register.

More detail at my comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7808698

[ Parent | on HN ]