> What makes you think correctness was not a priority for the software that put a man on the moon?

I reread what I wrote and I honestly don't know why you'd want to attribute that belief to me. Not acknowledging all the priorities in the correctness tradeoff was something I was writing against. Not counting correctness as a priority would certainly qualify.

I've always found NASA discussions of software quality to be interesting and informed by practical experience.

> Before running your mouth you should read the actual history

I consider your attitude harmful.