> What makes you think correctness was not a priority for the software that put a man on the moon?
I reread what I wrote and I honestly don't know why you'd want to attribute that belief to me. Not acknowledging all the priorities in the correctness tradeoff was something I was writing against. Not counting correctness as a priority would certainly qualify.
I've always found NASA discussions of software quality to be interesting and informed by practical experience.
> Before running your mouth you should read the actual history
I consider your attitude harmful.
He is right about one thing. Elegance and correctness require a certain level of intelligence and sophistication that the average software developer lacks.