I never argued that this should not be called warfare. I said that I did not think that this was a good example of asymmetric warfare. To which you responded that "asymmetric warfare" was commonly used to describe a "fight that is slowly playing out." This was also confusing to me. I will restate my queries in order to clear up any confusion:

  1. How is the CDN/ISP conflict an example of "asymmetric warfare"?
  2. Do you think the definition of "asymmetric warfare" is "a fight
     that is slowly playing out"?