Re:State of MetaFilter
by brandnewlow on Monday May 19, 2014 @02:45PM
(#7769044)
Reddit had fewer than 8 people when it was seeing orders of magnitude more activity than MeFi. I understand fully why its great to have humans doing this work, but this downsize could be a good thing in the long run if it forces them to find novel ways to make things scale better.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
do you really think reddit is a model of what a web community should look like? genuine question, because if that's the case then you're not exactly the intended audience
Re:State of MetaFilter
by brandnewlow on Monday May 19, 2014 @08:25PM
(#7770622)
Reddit is certainly a model of what a web community could look like.
MetaFilter has taken a different approach. The market is telling its team that approach is not economical. Perhaps there's some ideas they can borrow from sites like Reddit that baked more crowd-power and automation into their models from the get-go.
generating revenue isn't the same thing as providing a valuable service and it's kind of sad that i have to point that out in the first place. there's a reason i've read metafilter every day for over a decade and reddit is generally considered a step above 4chan.
Generating revenue /is/ the same thing as providing a service that can afford to remain in business, though. A service that shuts its doors because it runs out of money isn't being valuable to anyone at all.
Hopefully mefi can find a way to operate within their means without compromising their important characteristics.
Re:State of MetaFilter
by illuminate on Thursday May 22, 2014 @09:33AM
(#7783729)
"generating revenue isn't the same thing as providing a valuable service"
Well, from the cited stats, it's not enough of a valuable service to generate sustainable revenue.