Re:Type checking in Python
by yen223 on Sunday May 18, 2014 @10:38AM
(#7763184)
You're getting downvoted, but I think you have a point. Any attempts to enact type-checking in a language that doesn't require it is doomed to failure. You'll get all the safety of a dynamic language, with the flexibility of a typed language.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Type checking in Python
by frowaway001 on Monday May 19, 2014 @07:38AM
(#7766931)
> You'll get all the safety of a dynamic language, with the flexibility of a typed language.
That sounds a pretty good description of Go, so I'm wondering what his point is in the first place.