News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Type checking in Python. Parent comment

Re:Type checking in Python by clubhi on Sunday May 18, 2014 @10:16AM (#7763120)
Haskell is ok, but you should check out the dynamic nature of Python
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Type checking in Python by jbeja on Sunday May 18, 2014 @10:24AM (#7763144)
I think that the dynamic nature of python is why some folks prefer haskell over it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Type checking in Python by clubhi on Wednesday May 28, 2014 @12:14AM (#7808370)
yeah, that was my joke... no one got it. basically I'm talking about the never ending hunt for a perfect language
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Type checking in Python by coldtea on Sunday May 18, 2014 @01:42PM (#7763685)
Well, not that many. So that settles it then.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Type checking in Python by jbeja on Sunday May 18, 2014 @02:53PM (#7763915)
That is why i said some.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Type checking in Python by Dewie on Sunday May 18, 2014 @02:31PM (#7763838)
You should check out the dynamic nature of Typeable.

"The module Data.Dynamic uses Typeable for an implementation of dynamics."

http://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.7.0.0/docs/Data-Ty...

[ Parent | on HN ]