Counting headers is rather unfair.
C++11:
map<int, char> x = {{1, 'a'}, {3, 'b'}, {5, 'c'}, {7, 'd'}};
Any not-ancient C++ using boost Assign:
map<int, char> x = map_list_of (1, 'a') (3, 'b') (5, 'c') (7, 'd');
Shamelessly stolen from here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/138600/initializing-a-sta...
That's tricky, because C++ is statically typed and you've selected a varying value type, but here's the closest thing in real terms.
#include <map>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <boost/any.hpp>
using boost::any;
using std::map;
using std::string;
using std::vector;
int main() {
map<string,any> x = {{"foo", 34}, {"bar", vector<int>{1,2,3}}, {"bar", "quux"}};
}
Syntax overhead amortizes to constant factor ;)
Re:Why Python is Slow: Looking Under the Hood
by GFK_of_xmaspast on Friday May 09, 2014 @08:59PM
(#7724076)
I agree with the upstream comment about expressiveness, but this isn't a fair example.
The headers alone for STL maps are hundreds of LOC.