News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why AT&T Killed Google Voice by aditya on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @11:36PM (#771996)
yes, but coming from the WSJ which is a lot more widely read by policymakers than, say, TechCrunch this gives the issue a lot more coverage which is probably the right way to think about how it can be addressed by those with the power to address it.
Re:Why AT&T Killed Google Voice by calcnerd256 on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @11:42PM (#772006)
Exactly. It's fluff to us, but it's news to policymakers. It reminds me of a comment someone made about an article that claimed that nobody will read your thesis: something about an informal section to go with the formal parts. Well, more-mainstream journalists reporting on something we already know up in our ivory towers is a way to get the message out there.
Re:Why AT&T Killed Google Voice by drewcrawford on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @11:42PM (#772004)
Not to disagree with you, but most big news outlets (WSJ included) have been whining about how blogs pirate their stories and re-spin them for Google juice. Turnabout is fair play.

Tell you what, I'll subscribe to the first newspaper that digs up the AT&T/Apple contract.