Re:Crunched
by greendestiny on Wednesday November 07, 2007 @10:27PM
(#77320)
How do those jurisdictions judge betting on the result of a match? Picking players on their teams likely performance would surely be a significant part of the game.
Although given that what you're doing isn't odds adjusted, it's probably not that great a comparison.
Re:Crunched
by mattmaroon on Wednesday November 07, 2007 @10:56PM
(#77333)
That falls under the purview of traditional online sports betting which is illegal in every state but Nevada (where it is legal intrastate with tight regulations).
Re:Crunched
by greendestiny on Wednesday November 07, 2007 @11:52PM
(#77354)
Yeah either way I think its fairly clear draftmix should be considered the same as any other fantasy sports league. I guess my point is that betting on the result of a game is usually accompanied by odds to increase the luck the component, and fantasy sports doesn't.
You'd think picking week by week would control the randomness, certainly you're much less likely to be hit by an injury which would be one of the largest random components. Also players tend play well or badly in patches.
We're staying away from states where that test is too stringent (i.e., many states ban games that involve any luck at all). In the ones in which we operate (39) the test is typically that luck is the predominant factor. We feel that given a large sample we can mathematically prove that a player can win over time regardless of luck. We're certainly seeing that so far.