News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TextSecure's Private Group Messaging by tptacek on Monday May 05, 2014 @05:44PM (#7701475)
Maybe some other reader can tell me whether Nadim is saying that he endorses TextSecure's continuous transcript consistency model and is working on folding it into his new protocol, or whether he thinks the mpOTR model of consistency checking only at the conclusion of sessions is so useful that not providing it is worth dinging TextSecure over, or whether there's some third option I'm excluding. Because I can't even figure out what Nadim is trying to say anymore.
Re:TextSecure's Private Group Messaging by kaeporan on Monday May 05, 2014 @05:49PM (#7701499)
I endorse continuous transcript consistency, but believe that TextSecure currently does not allow its users to benefit from it and that this should be resolved. I think mpOTR is irrelevant to this discussion. I hope that's clear!