News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Using Wikipedia in the classroom: a cautionary tale by grkvlt on Monday May 05, 2014 @05:25PM (#7701375)
> Deletes every single thing the student contributed

Yes, this is what I don't understand. I think other commenters here haven't actually realised this is what happened, as well, and aren't seeing the problem.

One thing I find annoying about Wikipedia is that there is basically no owner or point of contact for the content. So, if I have an idea for a change, I can add a comment to the Talk page for the article, but it'll often languish there for months (years) on some pages. I've never gotten a sense of 'community' there, and although I've made 500+ edits and contributed new articles and been a member of a 'WikiProject' I still wouldn't class myself as a 'Wikipedian' nor would I know how to assign that role to someone else.

Re:Using Wikipedia in the classroom: a cautionary tale by araneae on Tuesday May 06, 2014 @09:21AM (#7704237)
I've been a Wikipedia editor for ages, and I have noticed this. You can't wait around for other people to reply.

Generally if I'm about to do something potentially controversial, I write a comment on it in the talk thread, and then I go ahead and do it. If others have a problem with it they'll fix it. You kind of have to have a "ask for forgiveness" attitude towards non-active pages.

Re:Using Wikipedia in the classroom: a cautionary tale by DanBC on Wednesday May 07, 2014 @06:31AM (#7709450)
The wiki way is "bold, revert, discuss".

That is often catastrophic and will get you templates and warnings, and will make it very hard to push through any edits.