News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl... by andrewtbham on Friday April 25, 2014 @02:39PM (#7648303)
I watched a senate hearing where Elon Musk squares off with the ULA. It's awesome. One great quote is where the ULA says Space X can't handle the missions. Elon responds. If our rockets are good enough for NASA, they are good enough for the Department of Defense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_azyt1JhI0

Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl... by m_mueller on Friday April 25, 2014 @05:22PM (#7649117)
That was an interesting watch, even as a foreigner. The ULA representative did everything he could to defend their contract - a 'good' politicians as it seems. He responded pretty well to Feinstein's chart I have to say - a chart with cost per ton in orbit would have been much more informative and I couldn't deduct from her numbers whether that has actually gone up significantly. Musk's response to Shelby's remark on a partial SpaceX mission failure was very witty - "according to ULA's standard's this mission was perfect" - he seems to be very good at thinking on the foot.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl... by seanjensengrey on Friday April 25, 2014 @11:54PM (#7650379)
Yeah, that chart is painful. Talking about absolute dollars with no basis is not productive.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl... by ElComradio on Friday April 25, 2014 @05:08PM (#7649045)
I suspect if you asked a DoD gal if it was more critical that, say, a military commsat got to orbit than something that measures solar flares, she'd beg to differ with Elon.
Re:SpaceX Successfully Soft-Landed Booster Rocket in the Atl... by sitkack on Friday April 25, 2014 @07:04PM (#7649623)
Yeah we all would expect them to say that. Everyone's baby is the cutest. Everyone's problems are the most important.