News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company by cmelbye on Thursday April 24, 2014 @05:28PM (#7643156)
Safe? It threw the Internet into uproar, which continues today as they force YouTube users to either use their real names or create a Google+ brand page for their YouTube username. That doesn't sound like a safe decision to me.
Re:Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company by Tyrannosaurs on Friday April 25, 2014 @12:06PM (#7647317)
Realistically:

(a) It threw a small but vocal corner of the internet into an uproar. Now many, many of those people were smart and had really thought about the issue and the problems it would cause, but the sad truth is that a vast majority of people really didn't care.

(b) Pretty much anything throws a small but vocal corner of the internet into an uproar.

Re:Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company by prawn on Sunday April 27, 2014 @06:01PM (#7657141)
Much of the majority follows the lead of that vocal minority. This is part of how Google gained supremacy in search.
Re:Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company by Tyrannosaurs on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @04:57AM (#7665787)
I'm curious about how you're establishing that the people objecting to this are the same people who were early adopters of Google search.

I was an early adopter of Google search back in the late 90s but I'm not that bothered about what they're doing with plus (I'd rather they were handling it differently but I'll take it or leave it).

I do see that some of the people who are objecting are potentially significant voices - I tried to reflect this in my post by saying they were people who had thought this through - but sadly having a good point doesn't mean that you'll always win the argument, particularly where massive commercial concerns are involved.