They did. "We will not accept future sponsorships from or partnerships with GitHub unless the situation changes significantly."
> The Ada Initiative's goal isn't to help github grow up, it is to help women and girls in tech.
Free private repositories "to over 500 women learning to write open source software" isn't beneficial to women and girls in tech? Having a well-known, well-funded, and (until recently) well-respected company sponsoring conferences isn't beneficial to women and girls in tech? I wasn't saying that they should care about how this affects Github. I'm saying they should care about how this decision affects them and their ability to carry out their stated mission.
They aren't nuking peoples repos. People are welcome to have free public repos on github and there is plenty of alternatives. Github != Git.
if github changes through action, not words, I am sure they could work something out. Space and time will heal this.
And yes, one always has to sacrifice something on principle, otherwise they wouldn't be principles, just more profitable choices.