News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by dennisgorelik on Monday April 21, 2014 @11:05PM (#7625538)
What's the reason to keep Chinese hieroglyphs if all people know and use pinyin anyway?
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by lvturner on Monday April 21, 2014 @11:28PM (#7625625)
Jump in a Beijing taxi and show the taxi driver the pinyin for the address you wish to go to instead of the Chinese characters. Report back on how well it works out for you.
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by gebe on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @07:51AM (#7627072)
One reason is ambiguity, this is an extreme example but shows a bit of the issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_D...
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by rangibaby on Monday April 21, 2014 @11:38PM (#7625663)
A lot of people have asked this same question for a long time.[0]

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Chinese_characters#B...

Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by Frqy3 on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @03:27AM (#7626282)
They provide a significantly greater density of conceptual labels, allowing better mental separation of the homophones.
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by owenjonesuk on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @02:50AM (#7626175)
Different dialects of Chinese use the same characters. Cantonese, for example. Switching to pin yin would only work for mandarin.
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by Kronopath on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @10:17AM (#7627758)
Disregarding your question, which others have answered plenty well already, I find it funny that you refer to them as hieroglyphics, since actual Egyptian hieroglyphics ended up being discovered to be phonetic as well!
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by damaohouzi on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @10:30AM (#7627842)
partially phonetic
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by ekianjo on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @04:51AM (#7626485)
Because each pinyin could mean a thousand of different things, so it's way easier to understand what they mean with an ideogram.
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by mitosis on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @11:38AM (#7628311)
Chinese writing does not encode sounds. It encodes meaning. If you write Chinese in pinyin, all you do is write down the sounds, not the meaning.

Said differently: why do we keep writing English like this, instead of using a phonetic alphabet? Same reason.

Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by prewett on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @01:34PM (#7629073)
Some of the characters do actually encode sounds, typically in the right side of the character. However, the encoding is more like a memory aid than it is phonetical. 中 (zhong1), 钟 (zhong1), 种 (zhong3/zhong4); 艮 (gen3), 跟 (gen1) 根 (gen1), but 很 (hen3). And it doesn't always work: 立 (li4), 位 (wei4), 拉 (la1).
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by aaronz8 on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @12:52AM (#7625879)
Not everyone knows and uses pinyin, especially older people.
Re:Why Chinese Is So Damn Hard (1992) by damaohouzi on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @10:29AM (#7627835)
They are not hieroglyphs, you will see no pinyin publicaly in China. Many ignorant americans come to China having studied Pinyin and they fall flat on their face.