News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Results of the GitHub Investigation by chippy on Monday April 21, 2014 @07:08PM (#7624591)
>if Julie wants to share this story so publicly then everyone should at least have all of the story

the whole thing is crass and distasteful to my british sensibilities, but if this the future of how conflict in internet corporations is represented, then we shouldn't be surprised to see allegations from all sides. The key skills that we as audience have to develop is critical thinking, impartiality and a good sense of decency.

Re:Results of the GitHub Investigation by 001sky on Monday April 21, 2014 @07:21PM (#7624654)
we shouldn't be surprised to see allegations from all sides.

The line is drawn at "anonymous internet sources". At least in the sense of euclidean geometry, that is not a "side" of the argument as much as it is a literary device to create an infinite attack surface.

Re:Results of the GitHub Investigation by jamesaguilar on Monday April 21, 2014 @09:26PM (#7625202)
Since you don't have a means of contact in your profile, I'm just going to tell you directly. That was an incredible turn of phrase. Really nicely said.
Re:Results of the GitHub Investigation by nailer on Tuesday April 22, 2014 @03:38AM (#7626307)
Anyone speaking against Horvath would be publicly attacked, and GitHub employees aren't allowed to speak of the matter. Unfortunately anonymity is the only option.
Re:Results of the GitHub Investigation by chippy on Monday April 21, 2014 @07:31PM (#7624712)
We shouldn't be surprised, still, but we should be more on our guard when looking at the sources from any angle.