News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A study I'd like to see done by mattmaroon on Sunday November 04, 2007 @03:09AM (#75994)
Not high. Money has diminishing marginal utility. If your net worth is high, you get little extra benefit for doubling it.

So I'd say $100k, just off the top of my head. Seems like risking 95 to win 100 is pretty good, not to mention it's trivial to get there.

Re:A study I'd like to see done by dfranke on Sunday November 04, 2007 @04:44PM (#76114)
If it's trivial to get there, then why wouldn't you be willing to go higher? Remember, you double your entire savings if you win. No matter how quickly your marginal utility curve flattens, it seems absurdly risk-averse to name any number lower than half of whatever you think you need in order to retire.
Re:A study I'd like to see done by mattmaroon on Sunday November 04, 2007 @11:24PM (#76194)
I'd need about two mil to retire comfortably I'd say. It's far easier to get to that from one million than it is to get to one million from $5,000. Hence I'd be seriously screwed, especially at that age, If I found myself with $950k and had to lose it all, whereas had I not made the bet, I'd probably be at most 5 years from retirement.
Re:A study I'd like to see done by dfranke on Monday November 05, 2007 @12:21AM (#76197)
Two million to retire comfortably? That's quite a standard of living. Supposing you're earning 6% interest and expect to live to 100, that's a budget of $10725 per month. That's enough to spend the rest of your life living in the penthouse suite of a cruise ship.
Re:A study I'd like to see done by mattmaroon on Monday November 05, 2007 @10:30PM (#76473)
Right. Exactly
Re:A study I'd like to see done by nostrademons on Sunday November 04, 2007 @05:11PM (#76119)
A retirement on half as much income as you'd like seems a lot better than a retirement on $5000...