Re:TrueCrypt Security Assessment [pdf]
by MichaelGG on Monday April 14, 2014 @04:56PM
(#7588879)
>doesn't mean we can use a password 1/1000th as long
It'd never work that way, right? You get to use a password with log2(1000) bits less. So e.g. if you use 2^24 iterations, and figure 80 bits is strong enough, then you can use a 56-bit password.
It'd never work that way, right? You get to use a password with log2(1000) bits less. So e.g. if you use 2^24 iterations, and figure 80 bits is strong enough, then you can use a 56-bit password.