News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Extend Python 2.7 life till 2020 by weixiyen on Sunday April 13, 2014 @05:09PM (#7583037)
^ This is the best comment in the entire thread.

Nobody who's making anything that actually matters and delivers value to customers cares about the improvements in the language itself as much as they care about the battle-tested libraries that come with that particular language.

If you are a company that actually matters (has significant growth / users) and you use Python3 over Python2 as the main language in your stack, I'd like to know who you are, if you even exist.

Re:Extend Python 2.7 life till 2020 by clamberson on Monday April 14, 2014 @11:15AM (#7586611)
I'm a build engineer at Intel (100,000+ employees), and we strictly use Python3. You act like it's a completely different language. It hurts the community when you blow the situation out of proportion. There are innumerable Python3 libraries, and while there are most certainly more in the Python2 camp, who cares? This isn't a dick-measuring contest; it's a change for the better in a language we all seem to like.
Re:Extend Python 2.7 life till 2020 by weixiyen on Monday April 14, 2014 @01:19PM (#7587473)
Is Python the main language you guys use, over Java/C++ as well? And what's the context of its usage? How do you deal with stuff that's missing, do you just have your own employees fork and port existing libraries?

I'm not asking as a challenge to you, I'm genuinely curious.