News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:a16z Programming Test by rdl on Friday April 11, 2014 @01:40AM (#7571383)
Seems like the obvious (if dishonest) thing would be to use a throwaway phone # to get the test, then spend a day or so solving it, then type it in (with plausible delays) using your real number a day later. Assuming the test is roughly the same each time (even if details are different, it's probably of the same general class).

In grading, the results of 6-8h of work entered in 2h would look more impressive than 3h of work in 3h, I suspect.

(Sometimes I hate that whenever someone gives me a situation, my first thought is "how can this be cheated or gamed", followed by "what controls can I put in place to prevent that, and and what costs"; it's basically automatic.)

Re:a16z Programming Test by rmmw on Friday April 11, 2014 @01:54AM (#7571412)
Credentials through phone # is more of a deterrent. We're also going to have an in-person coding exercise as a next step, which would be much harder to game :)
Re:a16z Programming Test by flylib on Friday April 11, 2014 @04:33AM (#7571789)
are you saying you go straight to a in-person coding exercise as the next step? seems odd, there is no phone interview between then?
Re:a16z Programming Test by golergka on Friday April 11, 2014 @07:14AM (#7572220)
Why would you want to appear better then you are at the interview? You'll get found out eventually later, and this will end up just spending your time.
Re:a16z Programming Test by sireat on Friday April 11, 2014 @11:12AM (#7573310)
There are plenty of developers/programmers who do not ace tests with rigid constraints, but are quite competent in a more relaxed setting.

That is they are not the 1% that the all hirers, but they are maybe top 20% and that is actually what most jobs require no matter the delusions of hiring managers.

Granted this particular job might be an exception but I doubt it.