News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by naz on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:11PM (#756708)
Stackoverflow is already geared toward and full of css and HTML questions. What gap is this site trying to fill?
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by rudd on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:34PM (#756778)
Not exactly a gap. It's just trying to be a domain-specific site. There're plenty of examples of this. For example, you could view HN as a domain-specific digg or reddit, for tech/startups. Even though you can make a subreddit or similar.

Perhaps they felt there was a lot of bad quality for HTML/CSS question and answers on StackOverflow, so they built this. I don't think so, but it's possible that the creators do.

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by triffid on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @09:03PM (#756994)
I think there are a lot of poor HTML/CSS questions and answers on Stack Overflow, but I don't think separating them other programming questions and from non-front-end programmers is really going to help anyone.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by rokhayakebe on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:31PM (#756769)
Well, for one you don't need Openid to register. Stack overflow scares a lot of potential users. It is more geared towards programmers as opposed to designers.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by nsoonhui on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @10:35PM (#757124)
I prefer OpenID, and the lack of one stopped me from registering.

You can always provide options ( with/ without OpenID) for registration

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by whalesalad on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @09:10PM (#757003)
Yeah.. openid still feels really funny to me even as a developer. I guess I should read up more on how it actually works (behind the scenes).
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by staunch on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @09:54PM (#757068)
Screw it. I've implemented it many times and still don't prefer it myself. I like to be able to setup a new separate semi-anonymous account on each site I use.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by anshul on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @12:14AM (#757258)
If that's what you like then can't you just create a separate semi-anonymous openid for every site you use?
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by whalesalad on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @10:07PM (#757090)
Yep, I feel the same way. I'm much more a fan of something like clickpass where I can bootstrap my signup with details already filled in.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by wvenable on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @10:38PM (#757127)
I still haven't bothered to signup for Stackoverflow because of the OpenID requirement. If it has username/password it'd be done already.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by billpg on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @04:12AM (#757583)
Great news, myopenid is part of stackoverflow. Register with myopenid and use that to get into stackoverflow.

Okay, myopenid is really an independent entity, but just pretend they are part of the same company and it'll work out fine.

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by sireat on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @04:58AM (#757620)
I too am not a huge fan of current implementation of OpenID. However, if you have a throwaway account on Yahoo or Google, it is trivially easy to signup on Stackoverflow.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by phenwoods on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @04:47AM (#757612)
From the Stackoverflow blog http://blog.stackoverflow.com, this is an official sister site of Stackoverflow.

Will this mean that HTML/CSS questions will be migrated from Stackoverflow?

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by phsr on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:13PM (#756717)
My thoughts exactly, and it also looks like they may have some bugs to fix like here: http://doctype.com/why-floating-elements-being-pushed-around

Notice how the image covers the right hand nav??

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by pbz on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @08:13PM (#756881)
That's what you get for not using tables :)
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by adamhowell on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @08:59PM (#756985)
No, that's what you get for not preparing yourself for all the different shapes and sizes of user created content.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by pbz on Friday August 14, 2009 @12:06PM (#763270)
You can't prepare yourself for all the sizes and shapes created by the user. The minute you give up control of content you will end up with crap that like. If he had used tables at least the layout would have adjusted accordingly. It would not have looked pretty, but it would've been usable.
Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by mrshoe on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:33PM (#756775)
The cynic in me sees two differences:

1) Much smaller user base

2) The Litmus ad on the right side of every page

EDIT: The rest of me sees healthy competition and an interesting take on freemium marketing for their money-making app. :)

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by webwright on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @08:07PM (#756866)
"1) Much smaller user base"

Also a much more focused user base. From an advertising point of view, do you think it's easier to sell 10,000 uniques on a general web technology site or 5,000 uniques on a site that has a very specific audience like web designers?

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by brown9-2 on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @06:32AM (#757700)
I would argue that the SO userbase is already highly focused - on developers. Its not "general technology site", just "general developers" site. Its not as if that's an especially large and poorly defined group.

With a much smaller subset of potential users I think you'll also find a much more "focused" group of advertisers, i.e. a smaller group of interested advertisers.

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by dangoldin on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @12:17AM (#757266)
That's a pretty astute point.

I can see them sharing the same database for both sites but displaying the CSS/HTML questions both on doctype and SO, but doctype restricted to CSS/HTML only. This will allow them to get content through multiple channels but allow them to sell more targeted ads on doctype.

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by andreyf on Tuesday August 11, 2009 @07:39PM (#756791)
Much smaller user base

Since SO content is licensed under creative commons, there's no reason they can't feed in all questions into SO... I suppose it might be tricky to merge votes of the (much larger) SO audience with votes of their audience, and has interesting implications to SO's business, but it's certainly doable.

Re:StackOverflow for HTML and CSS by forgotmypasswd on Wednesday August 12, 2009 @12:47AM (#757301)
My question got answered in 4 minutes. I cant complain