I see a lot of heat generated in this discussion, but I don't see an answer to your second paragraph. That's the answer I want to see.
It is the easy scalping he mentioned.
A market maker can only stay in business if they sell as much as they buy and if the average sale price is above their average buy price. They lose money if they provide liquidity in the way of market moving forces.
Market makers try to avoid informed and "toxic" order flow and broker flow is guaranteed source of small uninformed orders that are most likely going to be crossing the spread.
Re:Michael Lewis: shilling for the buyside?
by vasilipupkin on Friday April 04, 2014 @04:51PM
(#7534286)
The answer is retail flow has no information - it's the ideal flow for professional market makers to trade against
While it's true that retail flow has no information, it's also true that a broker will obtain better executions if it does not sell order flow to HFTs.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?t=245029
https://institutions.interactivebrokers.com/en/index.php?f=1...
The other big scam seems to be HFT firms buying a broker's order flow - for hundreds of millions of dollars. For example, Schwab sold its order flow to UBS for 8-year contract in 2005, for $285 million. It was massively underpriced, Schwab is said to have left a billion dollars on the table. And UBS, in turn, sold Schwab's order flow to Citadel for an undisclosed sum. Why is the right to execute a broker's order flow so valuable? Nobody seems to have a good answer, but the obvious reason is that its easy scalping.