News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on CryptoCat iOS Application Penetration Test [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:CryptoCat iOS Application Penetration Test [pdf] by kaeporan on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @08:59PM (#7520165)
iSEC also audited TextSecure, but TextSecure chose not to publish the audit.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:CryptoCat iOS Application Penetration Test [pdf] by epsylon on Thursday April 03, 2014 @04:27AM (#7521563)
They didn't choose not to publish.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7520581

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:CryptoCat iOS Application Penetration Test [pdf] by tptacek on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @08:59PM (#7520167)
And? What does this have to do with the parent comment?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:CryptoCat iOS Application Penetration Test [pdf] by aeontech on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @09:09PM (#7520215)
The grandparent asked whether they have had a security audit, and parent said "I don't believe they've had an independent security audit." Seems like a straightforward reply to those.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:CryptoCat iOS Application Penetration Test [pdf] by tptacek on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @09:10PM (#7520220)
Oh. Duh. You're right. I was skimming my threads and lost the context. Thanks for pointing this out.
[ Parent | on HN ]