Re:U.S. stock markets are rigged, says author Michael Lewis
by AndrewBissell on Monday March 31, 2014 @01:12AM
(#7499762)
I really like your idea of allowing sub-penny ticks in the highly liquid stocks as a way of tilting algo trading away from the latency arms race. Unfortunately, it probably runs too counter to the uninformed "no one should be trading to make $0.01 per transaction!" popular perspective for the SEC & exchanges to implement it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. stock markets are rigged, says author Michael Lewis
by kasey_junk on Monday March 31, 2014 @01:16AM
(#7499774)
As someone who actually makes a living in HFT, if you really wanted to get rid of me, sub-penny ticks would be the single worst thing I can think of. There is literally no transaction tax that would make trading unprofitable. 2 zero's worth of decimilazation though and I have to go find honest work.
Re:U.S. stock markets are rigged, says author Michael Lewis
by yummyfajitas on Monday March 31, 2014 @01:24AM
(#7499794)
I'd only get rid of you insofar as you are fighting over latency. If you can deliver price improvement or useful market depth there is still a place for you.
Re:U.S. stock markets are rigged, says author Michael Lewis
by kasey_junk on Monday March 31, 2014 @11:00AM
(#7501848)
I think decreasing the minimum bid/ask spread value would make it very difficult to continue doing traditional market making. I think that exchanges would then need to add some other incentives/perks to ensure liquidity providers stayed on their exchange, which starts to sound more and more like a specialist system which I'm generally against.
Of course, I don't think there is some natural right for market makers to exist. I do really like the idea of an extremely small tick size as it much more elegant than a transaction tax.