News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Hackers' screen shots

After reading the article on fonts, I thought it might be kind of fun to share screen shots of our working environment. Just remember to edit out anything sensitive!
( 101 comments | 49 points | on HN )
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nostrademons on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @10:19PM (#74918)
As of now, the technology count is:

 Languages:
 4 Ruby
 4 Python
 4 C/C++
 2 Java
 2 Lisp
 1 HTML
 1 Scheme
 1 Mathematica
 1 Javascript

 Editors:
 8 Emacs
 5 Vim
 1 Visual Studio
 1 Eclipse
 1 Netbeans

 Browsers:
 8 Firefox
 2 Opera
 1 IE

 OS:
 11 *nix
 8 MacOS
 2 Windows
Possibly modulo a couple of miscountings. If people had multiple programs open (like one person with both Firefox and IE, or my own setup with Windows + Ubuntu VM), both are counted. I omitted obvious jokes, like the Commodore 64 screenshots or Don Knuth's desktop. And it only includes editors I could identify, so whatever you Mac folks are using to edit your Ruby isn't included.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by akkartik on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @10:58PM (#74927)
Nice. My desktop is a few years old, so subtract one from the C/C++ camp. I use python and ruby equally, though, so it doesn't help break that tie.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by boucher on Thursday November 01, 2007 @12:41AM (#74944)
Most of these people seem to be using TextMate. Personally, I prefer SubEthaEdit.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by hailpixel on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:18PM (#74750)
I seriously don't understand how you people can work with all the visual clutter. I like a much more naturalistic approach:

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/217/workspacefh6.gif

Re:Hackers' screen shots by cstejerean on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @04:38PM (#74803)
I used to live with visual clutter before I discovered virtual desktops. I now usually keep my windows maximized and just switch desktops when I need to go to a different window.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by mdemare on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @05:28PM (#74830)
Nice. http://inglua.com/blog/images/c64.png

Lack of syntax highlighting is very easy on the eyes.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by hailpixel on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:43PM (#74859)
I think its time to make a new texteditor / micro-ide
Re:Hackers' screen shots by abstractbill on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @12:40PM (#74700)
I'm sure my desktop would look pretty stark to most people. That's the way I like it though. Basically I only ever have two windows open, both maximized - Emacs and FireFox. I spend 90% of my time in Emacs - this is what it looks like:

http://abstractnonsense.com/desktop.png

(that's not my code btw - it's a random python library).

If I knew of a way to hide even more superfluous stuff (window decorations, the menu bar) I would do it.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by davidw on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @12:47PM (#74707)
Wow - couldn't you squeeze in some more emacs windows on the right to visit more files at once? Or is that kind of thing just noise/distraction? I could certainly see some people preferring the simplicity to my more noisy 3 emacs windows and 4 rxvt's.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by abstractbill on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @12:54PM (#74710)
Yup, it's just noise to me. I prefer to have the other buffers loaded in Emacs, but not displayed on the screen where I'll be distracted by them.

My perfect dev environment would go as far as blanking out everything in my peripheral vision too - maybe a set of VR goggles that only displays an Emacs window, dead center ;-)

Re:Hackers' screen shots by vegashacker on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:23PM (#74722)
I do the single plain window of emacs thing too (though I use Terminal, not the built-for-mac Emacs GUI, and I only go 90 chars wide on my window). I usually run three UNIX shell buffers inside of emacs, in addition to all the source code buffers. I never go to the mouse while in Emacs (because it doesn't do anything), which helps me move quickly.

<snobbery>I get a bit frustrated when I need to look over someone's shoulder while s/he is doing some programming related task. So many people move very slowly thru their environments. I want to show them the way...</snobbery>

I wasted about 2 hours of my life once trying to trick out my Mac to be that "one Emacs window and nothing else" setup that you're talking about. I never really found anything that worked, though.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by damien on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:12PM (#74864)
This may seem like an obvious point, but have you tried Linux (or another Free OS) with a tiling window manager? OS X does give you a nice prepackaged experienced, but if you love to tinker and have complete control to customize anything, Linux is ideal. And you can always dual boot, if you just want to try it out part time. =)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by vegashacker on Thursday November 01, 2007 @01:45AM (#74965)
The thing is, when I'm doing anything but programming (web surfing, watching a DVD, playing music, etc.) I want the smooth, easy-to-use, pleasant-looking experience that I get on a Mac. I periodically try Unix window managers to see how they're doing, but they honestly always seem pretty clunky to me.

But let's say for a minute that I did go the Unix window manager route. What would you recommend if I wanted to have one "mode" where basically everything is stripped away (no menu bar, no windows, nothing -- just a shell), and another mode which was your standard GUI? It would have to be fast to switch between the two.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by earthboundkid on Thursday November 01, 2007 @03:38AM (#74982)
Install X11 on your Mac and set it to run in fullscreen mode. Then install xemacs or whatever and you're set. When you're in X11, fullscreen programming. When you Cmd-tab away, OS X goodness.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by pc on Thursday November 01, 2007 @07:34AM (#75023)
If you want a tiling WM, ratpoison runs just fine under X11.app on the Mac -- and you can have it replace the standard Quartz WM via .xinitrc
Re:Hackers' screen shots by akkartik on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:50PM (#74734)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by mdemare on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:20PM (#74752)
That's an utterly bizarre font you're using - otherwise... nice!
Re:Hackers' screen shots by akkartik on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @03:14PM (#74768)
I like modd. No other font is as legible at 9pt. I like that 0 and O look different, as do 1 and l. I like that all characters have some slight asymmetry - characters with character ;)

http://www.jmknoble.net/fonts

Re:Hackers' screen shots by mqt on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:08PM (#74840)
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~apox/images/screenshots/20071031.png

My four desktops merged into one image. I'm using FreeBSD+ion.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by slashcom on Thursday November 01, 2007 @02:29AM (#74970)
Girl Talk: excellent choice of hacking music.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by imsteve on Thursday November 01, 2007 @09:38AM (#75038)
Downloading now. If you're wrong then die. Free beer otherwise.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by r7000 on Thursday November 01, 2007 @12:25PM (#75085)
he was right.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by aaroniba on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:12PM (#74863)
+1 for ion! brilliant window manager. I don't know how I could be as productive without it.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nikolaj on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:01PM (#74895)
as an RIT CS grad ('03), I cackled when i saw your desktop.. very CSH :)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by apgwoz on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @08:31PM (#74887)
I love the emacs color scheme.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by henning on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @12:06PM (#74686)
this is from some loser named Don Knuth: http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/screen.jpeg
Re:Hackers' screen shots by amichail on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @03:44PM (#74782)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by Zak on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:02PM (#74742)
http://64.74.153.35/~zak/screen.png

Normally 1680x1050, but I'm using an external monitor until I find time to get my laptop's LCD fixed.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by mdemare on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:16PM (#74749)
Can you live with that font? No anti-aliasing and Courier New?
Re:Hackers' screen shots by Zak on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:31PM (#74755)
It was good enough for...

Actually, yes. It's quite readable and fairly compact. I've tried a few other fonts (most of the ones mentioned in the fonts thread on here) and found most of them take up more space or are less readable. Dejavu Sans Mono might look better with anti-aliasing turned on, but most of the time I've found anti-aliasing just makes fonts look blurry.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by Shorel on Thursday November 01, 2007 @10:23PM (#75297)
Lucida Console is both more compact (the reason I use it) and more readable.

Just my 2 cents.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by mdemare on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @11:52AM (#74675)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by dcurtis on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @03:13PM (#74767)
Wow, Mac OS X in non-widescreen. For some reason, seeing it like that is a jarring experience.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by mdemare on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @05:30PM (#74831)
I hate widescreen, I'd use portrait mode if my monitor could pivot.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by cglee on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:37PM (#74728)
Need to increase test coverage :)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by brlewis on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @04:25PM (#74798)
My emacs-centric working environment:

http://brlewis.com/y/2007/devscreen.png

It's slightly contrived, in that I usually have only one buffer open. I wanted to show that my environment involves switching back and forth between my ideas.txt file where I aggressively prioritize, and the actual BRL and Scheme files where the real coding is done. A large portion of my work is done in 35-minute train rides.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by ajmoir on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @03:31PM (#74774)
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/396296975_1f2e6f41a6_b.jp...

Linux running Xfce.

Couple of VMs a Xnest and DVD player. And I say again the current way we layout apps is broken. I have a wide screen monitor and most apps do not resize. I anybody working on something to fix this so that an app designed for 640x480 renders a reasonable size on my screen.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by kingnothing on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @05:20PM (#74825)
http://aycu09.webshots.com/image/32248/2004585555465429860_r...

Software: Ubuntu 7.10, Netbeans, Opera. Hardware: 2 x 1280x1024 monitors.

Edit: Whoa, apparently webshots doesn't like PNGs. Try this link instead.

http://img444.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotzh0.png

Re:Hackers' screen shots by brianr on Thursday November 01, 2007 @11:32AM (#75066)
Here's mine:

http://www.stanford.edu/~brianrue/workspace.png

I just alt-tab between Zend and firefox/konsole; at work I run another screen of Firefox off my windows laptop. I don't know how a lot of you can live with so much clutter on your screen, it drives me crazy.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by utnick on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:05PM (#74712)
you vi/emacs/console guys can hate, but deep down inside you wish your ide was as tight as this :) :)

http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/4349/desktopel7.jpg

Re:Hackers' screen shots by abstractbill on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:29PM (#74726)
Heh. I think it's funny that the trend in modern IDEs is for your code to get squished into a smaller and smaller box in the middle, surrounded by a ton of random crap. It's the exact opposite to the environment I strive for.

(also, "Solution Explorer"? That was the best name they could come up with?)

Re:Hackers' screen shots by akkartik on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:00PM (#74741)
To be fair, he seems to have enough space for code. horizontally at least. Monitors today have plenty of space for random crap. But the bottleneck isn't real estate anymore, it's focus.

What we need is for the other windows to gradually fade out when focus is in this one for a while. One of the video plugins/sites on tv-links had this feature - as you watched a show for a while the rest of the screen would gradually fade out.

Or we could go with two vertical panes: http://akkartik.name/desktop.html :)

Re:Hackers' screen shots by Zak on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:07PM (#74744)
Compiz has an option to do exactly that. It's called ADD Helper. Unfortunately, XGL doesn't perform very well on my laptop.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by tyler on Thursday November 01, 2007 @01:12AM (#74948)
your font makes me want to stab my eyes out... otherwise, nice. :)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by akkartik on Thursday November 01, 2007 @04:26PM (#75180)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by rksprst on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:41PM (#74876)
Yes, it's called "Solution Explorer" because when you use Team Foundation Server you open up solutions. So "Solution Explorer" is very appropriate.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by SwellJoe on Friday August 08, 2008 @01:27AM (#270307)
Are you speaking English? It looks that way, but I can't parse "you open up solutions". Solutions of/to what? And how does one "open" a solution? I'm also not sure what a "Team Foundation Server" is. I know all of the words separately, but put them together, and they no longer have any meaning for me. I think I missed a trend or a meme or a memo or a brochure or something.

I'm not intending to be a smartass, I really just have no idea what you just said, and looking at the screenshot doesn't really clarify. "Solution Explorer" looks like a file browser, to me.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by statictype on Friday August 08, 2008 @09:39AM (#270508)
In Visual Studio parlance, a 'solution' is a set of projects that logically belong together. For example, in a web site, your actual web app may be one project. A back-end scheduling task may be another, etc..

All of these together form a 'solution'. So, in that sense, the term 'Solution Explorer' kinda makes sense if you squint right. Whether or not the word 'solution' is appropriate at all is a different issue entirely...

Re:Hackers' screen shots by SwellJoe on Friday August 08, 2008 @02:40PM (#270875)
Ah, OK. So, a "solution" is made up of many projects, which is made up of many files? It sounds very enterprise-y. I'll promise to stay out its way, as long as it stays out of mine.

And I guess I can get by without knowledge of what a Team Foundation Server is or does.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by cstejerean on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @04:36PM (#74802)
I don't know, in my 1900x1200 window I have quite a lot of room for things besides the code on the side, like a REPL window, etc.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nikolaj on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:23PM (#74721)
yuck.

stuff like code folding and automagical code generation encourage all the wrong habits. Simple, readable, and reused code is "tight".

Re:Hackers' screen shots by Zak on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:18PM (#74751)
An upvote alone cannot express how much I agree. I spend a lot more time reading code (even my own) than I do writing it. Code generation and concise languages reduce the effort of writing code by similar amounts, but concise languages reduce the effort of reading code by an order of magnitude or two.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by cstejerean on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @04:35PM (#74801)
I don't know if that's true. What reduces the effort of reading code is using the right abstractions in the code. Concise languages can make some code incredibly hard to understand. I'm switching between Python and Lisp these days but I have never had problems reading things like Java because of the verbose syntax. I do however have problems reading Perl or badly written code in any language.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nostrademons on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:44PM (#74910)
concise != short.

You can have short code by using single-letter variable names and avoiding whitespace. It doesn't gain you anything. But concise code says exactly what it needs to say and no more, and that can be much more readable than lots of boilerplate.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by dfranke on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @10:44PM (#74923)
Up to a point, avoiding whitespace does gain you something. It means you can fit more code on the screen at one time. In languages with C-like syntax, I've taken to putting consecutive close-braces on the same line, at the indentation level matching the outermost brace. It's surprising how much it helps.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by boucher on Thursday November 01, 2007 @07:32PM (#75259)
I disagree. The amount gained to having more on the screen is much less than what is lost to readability. Whitespace is your friend.

I do exactly the opposite, where each bracket gets its own line, never going on the same line as code. This helps create an excellent visual division of blocks on the page.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by boucher on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @08:59PM (#74894)
I completely disagree. Objective-C is an incredibly readable language precisely because it is verbose. Message parameters have labels, what a concept!
Re:Hackers' screen shots by ptn on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:46PM (#74877)
Bad Vista.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by rksprst on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:48PM (#74878)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nostrademons on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:48PM (#74912)
Page is private.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by davidw on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:45AM (#74606)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by BrandonM on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @11:55AM (#74678)
That's about what mine looks like, except I usually have a browser window under the main terminal window, and I only use two workspaces instead of ten (!)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by davidw on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @12:01PM (#74683)
The browser is located in the lower left hand workspace, so it's just an alt-down arrow away from the workspace.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by german on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @11:56AM (#74679)
Ubuntu! Great Choice.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by chengmi on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:02PM (#74838)
I don't think 10 desktops is enough... best to double it. =)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by joshwa on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:06PM (#74713)
here's mine:

http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/3408/picture2jd3.png

Sorry for all the obfuscation.

Tiger, TextMate, Terminal.app, Locomotive, Firefox, Thunderbird, Adium, Twitterpod. A few more in the titlebar (Desktopple, SpritedAway (obviously turned off for now), MenuMeters), and plenty more in the Dock.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by noahlt on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:34PM (#74906)
That's a beautiful color scheme. Where/how can I get it?
Re:Hackers' screen shots by joshwa on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:44PM (#74909)
which color scheme? if you mean the rainbow gradient I used to cover my private info, that's just one of the default patterns built into photoshop.

Adium is using the standard "Aqua" theme.

TextMate uses the standard "Twilight" theme.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by noahlt on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:47PM (#74911)
I mean the one for syntax highlighting, which I suppose is TextMate (I don't use it).

Incidentally, there is a vim version here: http://niw.at/articles/2006/08/06/twilight

Re:Hackers' screen shots by thehigherlife on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:44PM (#74731)
is that adium as your chat window? if that is ichat how'd you get it to be borderless like that?
Re:Hackers' screen shots by joshwa on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:58PM (#74739)
yep, it's adium. "concise" contact list style, "group bubbles" window style.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by andrewfong on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:39PM (#74729)
http://andrewfong.com/stuff/Picture%201.png

Firefox is hidden and gets called up as necessary. If I have access to a separate monitor, it gets shoved onto there.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by hauk on Thursday November 01, 2007 @08:00AM (#75025)
Leopard, of course, with 4 spaces and xcode split-screen, Ubuntu 7.10 running under parallels. http://tildeslash.com/images/screenshot.png
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nmeyer on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:21PM (#74849)
Eclipse, vim and Opera. I like my syntax highlighting scheme, but not many people like colors as much as I do.

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/59/workspace.PNG

Re:Hackers' screen shots by davidw on Thursday November 01, 2007 @05:26AM (#75000)
Wow, that really is colorful, isn't it!
Re:Hackers' screen shots by kingnothing on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:40PM (#74856)
I have no clue how so many of you are only working on one monitor. Maybe you've never tried using two, but there's absolutely no way I could ever code again on just one.

The difference is night and day.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by nostrademons on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @10:14PM (#74916)
Some of us value the ability to hack in bed over the extra screen real estate.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by copenja on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @08:20PM (#74884)
I concur. I can't believe how many single monitor setups there are.

I am also surprised that more people don't use split screen setups where they can view multiple pages of code within the same window (ala emacs,gvim, Visual Studio). I prefer to have around four but atleast two views of code open at once.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by dfranke on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @10:52PM (#74926)
Screen real estate is like a drug. Addiction creeps up on you quickly, and the more you have the more you think you need. I used to be perfectly content with one 17" monitor. Now I'm looking for a bigger desk so that I can add a fourth 22" LCD.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by kingnothing on Thursday November 01, 2007 @04:16PM (#75177)
A fourth?

Wow. That's awesome.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by abstractbill on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:08PM (#74862)
I've tried working on multiple monitors, several times. It doesn't work for me.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by copenja on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @08:16PM (#74882)
Just curious, but what doesn't work for you about multiple monitors?
Re:Hackers' screen shots by kingnothing on Friday November 02, 2007 @02:26AM (#75363)
I'd be interested to hear why as well.

I find it's invaluable as you can have a web browser on one side and your code on the other.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by alexfarran on Friday November 02, 2007 @05:52AM (#75396)
I tried it and it made my neck hurt. I prefer a virtual desktop if I want multiple workspaces. Why move your head when you can make the screen move for you?
Re:Hackers' screen shots by jey on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:49PM (#74760)
http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/screenshots/ion3-2.png

OK, not really my desktop. But ion is quite cool.

About 50% of my programming time is spent staring at a maximized vim instance, and about 30% staring at a maximized firefox instance: http://jey.kottalam.net/tmp/screenshot.png

Re:Hackers' screen shots by omouse on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @04:31PM (#74800)
I actually do run ion3. The only problem I've had so far is that some of the Alt+ keyboard shortcuts interfere with some Emacs shortcuts. One off the top of my head: Alt+G.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by aaroniba on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:15PM (#74865)
I just remap/unmap the ion shortcuts to get out of the way of emacs. I have a friend who swears by setting ion's Mod1 to capslock, but my pinky just can't handle that.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by almost on Friday November 02, 2007 @10:35AM (#75426)
Set Ion's mod key to super (aka the windows key) and everything starts playing nicely :p
Re:Hackers' screen shots by llimllib on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @06:39PM (#74855)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nikolaj on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:14PM (#74718)
my work workspace (OSX) http://nikolajbaer.us/media/desktop.jpg

at home its similar, but xfce4 terminals and pidgin on xubuntu.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by tlrobinson on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:11PM (#74746)
viewbug?
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nikolaj on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:55PM (#74764)
ah, a project for a client.. damn i tried to snuff out things like that. It's just yet another media sharing site, we (I) built it in django with ffmpeg.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by henning on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @09:58PM (#74914)
there was some tutorial on recovering original text from gaussian blurs i saw out there, i.e. blurring isn't like a hash function. to be safe you have to totally black it out.
Re:Hackers' screen shots by nostrademons on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:07PM (#74743)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by adnam on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @02:42PM (#74759)
SDF has something like this: http://www.deskshots.org/
Re:Hackers' screen shots by damien on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:35PM (#74875)
Standard Emacs/terminal/Firefox on my laptop:

http://img524.imageshack.us/my.php?image=desktopak6.png

When I'm docked at work, I usually have Emacs on the monitor and terminal on my laptop screen.

Re:Hackers' screen shots by programnature on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @04:12PM (#74793)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by david on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @11:54PM (#74937)
http://webdever.net/screen.png

I could use a bigger screen...

Re:Hackers' screen shots by Goladus on Thursday November 01, 2007 @10:00AM (#75040)
http://www.goladus.com/images/wokr1.png

Cygwin, firefox, emacs, C, yacc, putty, outlook, python. (There's php in one of the emacs windows)

Re:Hackers' screen shots by jmtame on Thursday August 07, 2008 @11:23PM (#270251)
Re:Hackers' screen shots by alaskamiller on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @07:25PM (#74871)
i have 6 spaces open on my macbook pro. i run firefox, safari and mozilla. use adium, transmit, photoshop, terminal, and ituens on a daily basis.