News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Angular 2.0 by jimktrains2 on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @01:53PM (#7423653)
What about the blind who use screen readers or braille displays? Why should the page become so bloated that I can't read simple text simply?
Re:Angular 2.0 by mendelk on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @05:01PM (#7424938)
This is not an endorsement (or not) for blogs that rely on JS, but apparently 98.6% of screenreader users have javascript enabled.[0]

[0] http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey4/

Re:Angular 2.0 by jimktrains2 on Wednesday March 19, 2014 @10:32AM (#7428825)
Doesn't mean that it's makes for a pleasant or useful experience. Viz http://hanselminutes.com/413/im-a-blind-software-technician-... from a sibling comment of yours.

Also, I'm surprised I got downvoted for saying that we should be considering the disabled when making decisions on how to structure a blog. I know accessibility isn't _cool_ but it's the right thing to do, especially for a text-based site, like a blog.

(PS: mendelk, I'm not accusing you of downvoting me)

Re:Angular 2.0 by thatsar_ on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @04:49PM (#7424877)
I don't have first-hand experience, but my impression is that modern screen readers shouldn't have too much trouble with simple JavaScript like this.

Could anybody with experience confirm/deny?

Re:Angular 2.0 by TheHegemon on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @08:12PM (#7426011)
According to a recent podcast I listened to[1] about a blind Software user, it seemed like there is a lot of issues with the current generation of Screen Readers. This includes issues with JS.

1.http://hanselminutes.com/413/im-a-blind-software-technician-...