News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Consider the Nimrod Programming Language by CyberShadow on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @08:25PM (#7389372)
Seeing as how both Nimrod and D have invested into metaprogramming (and also "attempt a speed-elegance unification"), I think a comparison with D would be interesting. D doesn't have AST manipulation, though; the "parallel for" idiom is instead accomplished rather mundanely, using a custom iterator (http://dlang.org/phobos/std_parallelism.html#.TaskPool.paral...).

Another similarity is uniform call syntax (which D calls uniform function call syntax, UFCS for short).

Re:Consider the Nimrod Programming Language by barchar on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @08:57PM (#7389484)
Nimrod is indeed pretty similar to D, although I think it is a bit more uniform because of the way the object model works. Also "death to mustache braces"
Re:Consider the Nimrod Programming Language by TylerE on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @09:46PM (#7389644)
I'd say Nimrod feels like Python, D feels more like about what Java 9 or 10 will be.
Re:Consider the Nimrod Programming Language by geetduggal on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @08:43PM (#7389432)
Thanks for the suggestion, CyberShadow!