Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading

Re:Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading by iandanforth on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @02:01PM (#7387176)

Using a "let me google that for you" link on the problem with software patents seems unnecessary. Why imply your users are lazy? At first I thought the contrast between "whose patents are pending" and that link was a great bit of commentary, but that link was an unexpected slap. I was expecting an EFF link.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading by pkghost on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @07:55PM (#7389230)

Oops—did not wake up wanting to slap you :) My thought was more along the lines of "if you're not aware that this is a problem, here's a list of big/obvious headlines to pick from, or just walk away with the sense that there is an active conversation about the issue"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading by nedwin on Wednesday March 12, 2014 @09:47PM (#7389650)

I clicked the first link and wasn't convinced. Surely you would want to find the most convincing article that you could find and link to that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading by pkghost on Thursday March 13, 2014 @03:46AM (#7390507)

I would. Do you have one top of mind?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading by morrisjm on Thursday March 13, 2014 @12:37PM (#7392897)

http://endsoftpatents.org perhaps?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading by pkghost on Monday March 17, 2014 @05:21AM (#7413960)

I need something that Yogi Bear would understand :)

[ Parent | on HN ]