Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by alashley on Sunday March 02, 2014 @10:53PM
(#7331951)
I found the gratuitous use of the word 'fat' in this article kind of jarring.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by Zikes on Sunday March 02, 2014 @11:35PM
(#7332067)
It only appears three times, is a proper medical term, and is absolutely relevant to the article subject.
Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by daeken on Sunday March 02, 2014 @11:50PM
(#7332108)
"Fat" as a description of a person is as medically valid as "stupid". That is to say, not at all. "Overweight", "obese", and others are actual medical terms that have real definitions, quite unlike "fat".
Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by sdrothrock on Monday March 03, 2014 @12:13AM
(#7332153)
Agreed. All instances of the word "fat" are used by the writer. The only instance of a medical professional saying something that would warrant the word "fat" is Dr. Rolph, who is quoted as saying "overweight."
Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by nevvvermind on Monday March 03, 2014 @02:43AM
(#7332525)
Oh, I see. So synonyms of the word "fat" have real medical definitions. I think it's just that "fat" doesn't sound pretentious enough, so it's not clinical.
Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by irremediable on Monday March 03, 2014 @09:06AM
(#7333727)
They don't mean precisely the same thing. "Overweight" and "obese" can be defined, as categories, according to BMI, WHR, body fat percentage or similar. "Fat" is a lot less clearly definable.
Re:Rare Mutation Kills Off Gene Responsible For Diabetes
by Zikes on Monday March 03, 2014 @02:47AM
(#7332535)
I guess someone should notify Merriam-Webster: http://www.merriam-webster.com/medlineplus/fat