However, you have a very testable hypothesis here with the idea that these policies are the source of the inequality. And much like "Wet ground makes it rain," the hypothesis is easily disproven by considering the order that the correlated things happened in. The ground gets wet after it rains, and these events started being organized in response to the conditions you're suggesting they may have caused.
I assume that by "these events" you mean events targeted towards women. I never claimed anything about what events targeted towards women cause. I only mentioned events which support segregation, of which these events are a subset.
Let's hear your proposal for addressing the already segregationist technology industry.
Let's hear your proposal for elevating female/non-white founder percentages out of the single digits.
What've you got?
I'm doing something
something has been done.
full disclosure: I have no skin in this game, nor opinions. Just making an observation.
Stop supporting segregationist policies.
Definition of segregation for your convenience:
the action or state of setting someone or something apart from other people or things or being set apart
And perhaps the support of segregationist policies is the thing we're doing wrong.