Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Violates 4th Amendment [pdf]

Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by Mindless2112 on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @02:51PM (#7307197)

(Texas Appeals Court) Rules (((Phone Search) After Arrest) Violates (4th Amendment))

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by arh68 on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @03:27PM (#7307448)

I had different trouble.

.. (Appeals Court) Rules (Phone Search) After (Arrest Violates 4th Amendment) --nonsense

"phone search after arrest" is terribly confusing, though "post-arrest phone search" is clunky.

"Appeals Court" is probably the strongest 2-gram in the headline:

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=texas+appeals%...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by MattHeard on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @03:07PM (#7307302)

My brain quickly went through the following process:

(Texas) Appeals (Court Rules Phone...) nope.

(Texas Appeals) Court (Rules Phone...) nope.

(Texas Appeals Court) Rules (Phone Search...) yes.

Most of the words can not only both be verbs and nouns, but many appear to conjugate correctly as verbs when the preceding word is interpreted as a noun: "Texas Appeals", "Appeals Court", "Court Rules", "Rules Phone"*

*"Rules Phone" doesn't make as much sense, as rules are typically unable to phone anything, including searches.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by joeframbach on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @04:09PM (#7307829)

This was exactly my parse tree as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]