News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statement on Mt. Gox by wmf on Tuesday February 25, 2014 @03:53PM (#7300416)
Vigilante rewriting of the blockchain has been discussed before and it tends to get hung up on the issue of agreeing who's the thief and who's the victim.
Re:Statement on Mt. Gox by xdarnold on Tuesday February 25, 2014 @04:02PM (#7300472)
It seems like there is a straightforward enough principle in this case to do so without much argument. Not that the method would be perfect. But isn't it preferable to the alternative?