Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by staunch on Monday February 24, 2014 @04:24PM
(#7293492)
Once you get used to tools like `go fmt` or Perl::Tidy it feels barbaric not to be able to cleanly format all your code instantly. Read only linters are nice but something that can reformat code is much nicer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by Scaevolus on Monday February 24, 2014 @04:55PM
(#7293673)
Clang-format aims to provide this for C++.
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html http://www.irill.org/videos/euro-llvm-2013/jasper-hires.webm
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by jbergstroem on Monday February 24, 2014 @05:03PM
(#7293723)
While reading the article, I also thought why they didn't at least mention it (and why they abandoned the idea).
It's powerful, fast and will most likely be the base for a lot of {h,l}inting in editors/IDE's moving forward.
edit: Somehow missed that they mentioned Clang not being mature enough when starting this project.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by eliasmacpherson on Monday February 24, 2014 @05:04PM
(#7293731)
http://astyle.sourceforge.net/
linters are more important that pretty formatting to my mind. c++ has had both linters and reformatters for a long time.
I suppose the distinction is that they are not built in.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by sliverstorm on Monday February 24, 2014 @04:37PM
(#7293558)
Huh? You know that a linter is not a formatter, right?
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by DanHulton on Monday February 24, 2014 @04:54PM
(#7293669)
Pretty sure he does. His comment only makes sense in that context.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by sliverstorm on Monday February 24, 2014 @04:56PM
(#7293689)
I guess I just don't see that. perltidy and lint(s) are completely nonoverlapping, to my knowledge. Something that can reformat your code doesn't even do the same job as a linter.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by mbell on Monday February 24, 2014 @05:03PM
(#7293724)
I'm not really following you. It's very common for linters to flag stylistic and formatting issues.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by sliverstorm on Monday February 24, 2014 @05:05PM
(#7293736)
Ah well, perhaps it's just a difference in experience. I've never used a linter (there are countless linters) that fixed indentation, arranged if statements, and inserted newlines to wrap long lines. Nor has a formatter ever helped me find the sort of issues I use a linter to find.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by maw on Monday February 24, 2014 @09:30PM
(#7294928)
There is overlap. I once lost a fair amount of time because some dimwit predecessor thought putting anything other than a space after commas was acceptable. (It sounds ridiculous but it's true. I can explain if you care.)
So: a formatter will, for example, make sure your lines are indented to some standard amount of indentation, a linter will bitch if they are not, and both the formatter and the linter should DTRT when they identify certain indefensible coding practices.
Re:Facebook Open Sources flint, a C++ linter written in D
by he_the_great on Tuesday February 25, 2014 @03:16PM
(#7300157)
I wouldn't want to reach for lint to handle formatting, that is what indent is for. That is to say, lint should not complain that the if should contain a space before the (.