Re:Your dotfiles and you
by ygra on Monday February 24, 2014 @05:39AM
(#7290080)
Wouldn't something like Dropbox (or some kind of hacky rsync/shellscript/cron replacement) be more appropriate for that? Usually you don't want to version your configuration files; you just want them to be the same in all places. And with a repository I still have to think about committing, pushing and pulling.
Re:Your dotfiles and you
by weland on Monday February 24, 2014 @06:00AM
(#7290138)
My dotfiles have acquired enough cruft and interdependence in the many years they've been written that I certainly benefit from keeping them under version control. If all you have is a dozen lines in .bashrc and .tmuxrc it's ok, but once you pile up custom scripts and configs it gets out of hand quickly and you actually end up with regressions.
Re:Your dotfiles and you
by grota1981 on Monday February 24, 2014 @06:08AM
(#7290159)
I'm the author of the article.
I think that the fact of having a repository actually is more appropriate, because (at least for me) dotfiles are really not a static set of files. At least say, once a week, I end up changing something, something that I'm not 100% sure I'll adopt in my workflow. So I create a branch for that change that I can safely delete later if needs be.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6331485
http://taihen.org/managing-dotfiles-with-gnu-stow/
[1]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/rcm