Re:Colorado Pot Tax Proving More Lucrative Than Expected
by monkeyspaw on Sunday February 23, 2014 @04:22AM
(#7285380)
I was going to upvote you until I saw your edit about downvoting. I believe you should state your mind without concern for arbitrary internet points. If you express concern over these points, it weakens your perspective, in my opinion, and I am much less likely to award you those useless points.
Re:Colorado Pot Tax Proving More Lucrative Than Expected
by wavefunction on Sunday February 23, 2014 @01:27AM
(#7285138)
I upvoted you, sometimes it's lonely being correct ;)
I strongly believe people who put down the lottery just can't let go of their super-rational minds and just enjoy an irrational thrill every once in a while. Sure, the people who spend $100 a month on Lotto when they only make $400/mo... that's a bad decision. But just $2 once every couple of months when the jackpot is some insane number? Why not? It's just $2 bucks! Yes the odds of you winning are smaller than Plank Length[1], but just let yourself go every once in awhile and enjoy a thrill and imagine "What If...". The Lottery is not a scam; assuming you understand the chances of winning is as close to zero as can be without actually being zero. People actually do win & get the money. Now, if someone can prove to me that all the winners are fake and nobody ever gets any of this money... then that's another story.
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length
EDIT: Downvoted. Not surprised; I just tried to make an argument about letting go of rationality on HN. That's probably the most offensive thing I can say here. :)