News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Colorado Pot Tax Proving More Lucrative Than Expected by learc83 on Saturday February 22, 2014 @06:08PM (#7284060)
http://news.thoracic.org/june-july-2013/annals-ats.php

"findings from a limited number of well-designed epidemiological studies do not suggest an increased risk for the development of either lung or upper airway cancer from light or moderate use, although evidence is mixed concerning possible carcinogenic risks of heavy, long-term use,"

"In summary, the accumulated weight of evidence implies far lower risks for pulmonary complications of even regular heavy use of marijuana compared to the grave pulmonary consequences of tobacco."

By greatly, I meant as bad as tobacco which dramatically increases the risk of lung cancer.

The previous poster was commenting on the health risks of tobacco being caused entirely by burning plant matter. However, the evidence suggests this isn't true.

Re:Colorado Pot Tax Proving More Lucrative Than Expected by carbocation on Saturday February 22, 2014 @07:26PM (#7284359)
October 2013: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846283

> "In summary, the accumulated weight of evidence implies far lower risks for pulmonary complications of even regular heavy use of marijuana compared to the grave pulmonary consequences of tobacco."

Yeah, I think mostly this comes down to the above discussion of "greatly" -- marijuana seems to have some correlation with lung disease and cancer, but it seems to be less than tobacco.