News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neovim by Crito on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:44PM (#7279295)
If that is all you need and expect from a replacement for LaTeX, why aren't you just using LibreOffice?
Re:Neovim by tinco on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:49PM (#7279327)
It's not, I need the human readable source part, so I can track my work and cooperate in git :) I use LibreOffice for some stuff though.
Re:Neovim by davidgerard on Friday February 21, 2014 @04:41PM (#7279615)
Versioning of OpenOffice/LibreOffice documents using git: http://blog.riemann.cc/2013/04/23/versioning-of-openoffice-l...
Re:Neovim by blueblob on Friday February 21, 2014 @08:40PM (#7280620)
That is really cool, thanks for that.
Re:Neovim by Crito on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:54PM (#7279363)
Aren't modern word processor formats just zipped-up XML files? I suspect it should be a straight-forward matter to get at least LibreOffice and version control cooperating.
Re:Neovim by TylerE on Friday February 21, 2014 @05:06PM (#7279772)
You are technically correct, but not usefully so. The XML is pretty hairy. A VCS that handles XML semantically (e.g. tag-pair oriented, rather than line-oriented) might have some shot....but, basically, merges are more or less not going to work so it's not really version control, just backups.
Re:Neovim by PeterisP on Saturday February 22, 2014 @03:37AM (#7281440)
If we're talking about LaTeX, Word, Markdown and LibreOffice - well, then LibreOffice is a contender for the worst usability, it's superficially similar to a mature product but it's a case of "the remaining 10% of goodness will take more work than the first 90%".
Re:Neovim by Crito on Saturday February 22, 2014 @02:03PM (#7283130)
Usability depends on who is using it. I refuse to use LibreOffice because it is so bad, but I would sooner recommend LibreOffice to my father than LaTeX or Markdown.