News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcrypt broken by Tegran on Thursday February 20, 2014 @06:43PM (#7274465)
Malware author probably uses a multitude of wallets, but the one shown in that screenshot has received a few actual payments:

https://blockchain.info/address/1HKCHx1RFhNHuF3NxLviHdrjNFzJ...

Re:Bitcrypt broken by wbillingsley on Thursday February 20, 2014 @07:26PM (#7274656)
It always seems a little odd to me that bitcoin is associated with criminal enterprise. Surely with the transaction record public, it's rather easier for the police to "follow the money" than with cash etc?
Re:Bitcrypt broken by aroch on Thursday February 20, 2014 @07:51PM (#7274751)
You can "follow the money" electronically, but unlike bank transfers there's no physical connection. Going from imaginary point 1 to imaginary point 2 doesn't really tell you anything.
Re:Bitcrypt broken by dllthomas on Thursday February 20, 2014 @07:53PM (#7274760)
But some transactions are ultimately linked to the physical world, and that gives a window through which more can be pinned down over time. Operating from just the blockchain doesn't tell you very much, but combined with other things it's a lot more informative than cash movements. You're never leaking less than you think.
Re:Bitcrypt broken by ifross on Thursday February 20, 2014 @08:45PM (#7274935)
Bitcoin mixers can make it almost impossible for people to follow bitcoin transactions, providing that the number of coins in the mixer far exceeds the amount you are trying to mix.
Re:Bitcrypt broken by dllthomas on Thursday February 20, 2014 @11:07PM (#7275389)
Again, you're never leaking less information than you think. I also expect that using bitcoin mixers will be prosecutable under AML laws in the medium term, if they aren't already.