Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by dredmorbius on Friday February 21, 2014 @08:58AM
(#7276968)
The lack of a time-bounded search is one of the few things I'll return to Google for.
Also: news, and book or Google Scholar.
I'm willing to accept the lack of these most of the time. Yes, privacy matters to me.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by hahainternet on Thursday February 20, 2014 @01:26PM
(#7272616)
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/1734130?hl=en might be useful for you.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by pbhjpbhj on Thursday February 20, 2014 @03:30PM
(#7273333)
Link is to "verbatim mode" which is basically "Google classic" where all the words entered are required to be on the page in the order entered - kinda like a single set of quotes around the full query.
Not exactly what I'm after but might be useful, thanks.
I did blind search engine testing and Google came out on top.
That said Google is frustrating me more and more, especially now you need to "put it in quotes" if you don't want them to just show you things they think might be tangentially related in some way to your search and, you know, show you results with the actual terms in.
It's quite interesting to me that Google's main advantage when I first used it was I didn't need to AND all my terms together, it was the differentiating feature that won me over (I can't recall who from, it was around the time of Teoma and AllTheWeb IIRC). Now even when you use the cumbersome notation to say a term is required it still shows you pages without the term on ... but it nonetheless is the best offering I can find (for me). Argh!